![]() Regardless, the point I am trying to make in this paragraph is that - for me - Affleck's presence immediately added entertainment value to the film but, taking Affleck out of the equation, how does the movie stack up? Not half bad, but not all that good either - a guilty pleasure if you will. It's clear he's not giving it his all in this performance, but for me personally, it didn't detract from the viewing experience (and to give you another perspective, my mum, who is not a Ben Affleck fan, thought he was great in his role, so keep that in mind). I'm a die-hard Ben Affleck fan, so take this review with a grain of salt, because I am biased in that regard it's always enjoyable to watch him on the big screen, and his performance in "Hypnotic" is no exception, even if he did look like he hated his life in the role. But all of that said, I'd be lying if I said that I didn't enjoy this movie, because I did. Instead, it falls into the realm of generic, direct-to-streaming movies that have flooded the market over the past decade. While watching "Hypnotic," I couldn't help but notice that it lacks the essence and vision of a Robert Rodriguez film at the same time, it also lacks the distinctive touch of any notable director.
0 Comments
Leave a Reply. |
AuthorWrite something about yourself. No need to be fancy, just an overview. ArchivesCategories |